Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Novo 2 Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.